Showing posts with label Trademark Registration Online. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trademark Registration Online. Show all posts

Friday, 14 February 2020

Cypriot Cheese Producers Re-Secure Trademark Protection For ‘Halloumi’


trademark registration

Cypriot farmers have recently won back the exclusive right to sell their cheese products as ‘Halloumi’ in the UK after re-securing the trademark it lost in 2018.

Participating on the part of these farmers, the Cypriot ministry first obtained  Trademark Protection for ‘Halloumi’ from the UK Intellectual Property Office in 1990. However, in association with a legal challenge brought by the UK-based cheese producers, the trademark had been revoked in the year 2018. The verdict was a result of an administrative error as the Cypriot ministry failed to respond to the legal requests within the asked time frame. Nevertheless, now the ministry has secured the protection again.

According to a Patent and Trademark Attorney, this significant win for the Cypriot farmers means that they have regained an exclusive right to use the mark ‘Halloumi’ while selling their cheese product in the UK. Because of the growing market for this product in the UK, this is expected to prove profitable for them. However, the farmers are unlikely to limit themselves there. They have already filed a Trademark Application for achieving ‘protected food name’ status to the European Commission, and if successful, their application would bring permanent protection. But as it’s likely to take some time, trademark protection in the UK will be beneficial to them in the meantime.

The attorney said that the food and drink producers in the UK might not be aware that they are allowed to apply for ‘protected food name’ status to secure protection for products with unique characteristics that can be linked to a specific geographical location or specified product. The attorney continued that this Trademark Registration certification would affect those who are producing cheese products. It is so because they could not label the product as ‘Halloumi’ unless it meets the certification mark requirements. Hence, restaurants should take care of not to define something as ‘Halloumi’ wrongly.

The attorney further added that if there’s no food name protection in place, and the misuse isn’t spotted as soon as possible, the use of the name or product could become generic. As a consequence, it would lose its eligibility for protected status. For example – ‘Cheddar’ is a name that has now become generic, and thus, no longer capable of obtaining such protection.

The Protected Food Name scheme, which was established by the UK government in 1993, is helpful for producers who want to use a geographical place name as part of their product’s brand identity for preventing others from marketing their items under the same name.

Since a large number of products have achieved the ‘protected food name’ status, there is no reason why Halloumi producers should not look for the same. Still, the application by these producers has been affected by many delays. Nonetheless, now it has gained the approval, meaning that the producers have re-secured ‘Halloumi’ trademark protection in the UK.  
✅   For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:



Contact - US

Wednesday, 25 December 2019

Amendments Made To Canadian Trademark Law On 17th June 2019


free trademark registration online

Countries, no matter whether to strengthen the existing trademark protection or to include additional rules, often bring changes in their trademark laws. Almost all of us know how crucial role the trademark law plays in the protection of Intellectual Property (IP) assets. By providing relevant and robust trademark rights, it helps the owners in not just preventing unauthorized users from using their unique creation but also creating goodwill among customers. However, to obtain expected results, it is crucial to stay up-to-date with the reforms made in such laws and their corresponding rights. Here, in this article, you’ll be going to get updated with the recent changes in the Trademark Law of Canada.
1.     Availability of Madrid Applications
Canadian applicants from now would be able to file the Trademark Applications in over eighty (80) countries worldwide just through a single international filing. With this new opportunity, it will be easy for Canadian applicants to manage their international trademark portfolios.
Similarly, applicants from the Madrid Protocol nations will be able to designate Canada in not just their International Trademark Applications but also existing Madrid registrations. Moreover, the incoming protocol applications would charge similar to the national applications – as per the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO).
2.     Increase in Filing and Renewal Fees

Filing Fees
Previously, CIPO tends to charge a fee of $250 for filing a trademark application encompassing any number of classes of products and services, along with $200 as the trademark registration fee. Nevertheless, to apply for a trademark after June 17, the applicant has to pay the filing fee of 330 CAD for the first class of products or services, along with 100 CAD for each additional class of products or services. For all these applications, the trademark registration fee is eliminated.

Renewal Fees
The renewal fee has been increased to 400 CAD from 350 CAD for the first class of products and services with an additional 125 CAD charges for each new class of products and services.
3.     Declarations of Use Is No Longer Required
After 17th June, Declarations of Use is no longer required for Trademark Registration in Canada. Note that this change applies to not just applications filed after June 17 but also applications pending as of this date. It means that all the applications filed before June 17, 2019, can proceed to trademark registration in Canada (once the opposition period expires) simply with payment of registration fee, without filing the Declaration of Use.
4.     Information Regarding Use Is No Longer Needed
Applicants filed the trademark applications on or after 17th June need not indicate whether he/she has previously used the trademark in Canada or abroad. In other words, the applications filed on or after this date are applicable to get approved even if they do not tell whether the concerned applicant has registered and used the Trademark in Canada or foreign countries.
5.     Nice Classification Appears Mandatory
As per June 17th amendments, all the new applications must be filed with Nice classifications. Moreover, the pending applications that have not yet advertised for objection/opposition purposes must be classified. Note that for unclassified registrations, the CIPO will request the Nice classification upon renewal.
Although this requirement of the Nice classification is expected to bring Canada more in line with the international norms, it does not mean that CIPO will become lenient in its practice of reviewing goods and services descriptions. All the goods and services must still be adequately specified under stringent standards set by CIPO.
Are You Getting Ready for Trademark Registration under Amended Law?
In the days after the reforms came into force, you as an owner, who’s looking for trademark registration in Canada should emphasize taking immediate steps, based on appropriate and up-to-date information. It will help you in saving costs in processes like filing multi-class applications, renewing multi-class registrations, etc. Besides, you must also think about streamlining your portfolio management. You should focus on using the Madrid international filing system and filing applications for non-traditional and international trademarks. For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:
   



Contact - US

Friday, 20 December 2019

Europe’s Top Court Adviser Says Amazon Must Check For Trademark Infringements

trademark registration online

An adviser to Europe’s top court has recently said that Amazon, the US online retail giant is not liable for unconsciously stocking products causing Trademark Infringement for third-party sellers, but should be careful in checking whether the products are legal or not.
The adviser gave his opinion on a case pitting Amazon against the US cosmetics firm Coty. The dispute reflects one of the many battles amid online platforms like Amazon, eBay, etc., fighting against online business barriers and luxury products firms seeking to preserve their branding and exclusivity. The opinion from Manuel Campos Sanchez-Bordona, the advocate general at the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), came in response to a case concerning Coty’s German subsidiary. It is the subsidiary that took Amazon to a German court for stocking its Davidoff perfume for third-party sellers.
Coty said that such practices infringe on its trademark rights, and Amazon should be responsible for stocking trademark infringing products.
Campos Sanchez-Bordona said that the companies, which are unaware of trademark infringements, cannot be held liable for storing such products for third-party sellers. He also raises the question of the online platforms’ responsibility for the content transmitted or products sold on their sites. He even said that if the firms actively participate in disseminating the products and operate schemes like Amazon’s, then they must show diligence in checking the legality of products advertised or sold on their platforms.
Amazon’s Scheme
The US online retail giant under its scheme known as “Fulfilled by Amazon” stores and delivers products for third-party sellers and this is one of the main features of its whole business model.
Campos Sanchez-Bordona continued by saying that the companies should be aware that they cannot absolve themselves of responsibility. They must understand that without this control, their platforms can serve as a channel for advertisement and sale of counterfeit, stolen, illegal, or unethical products.
Amazon, in regards to this, said that it made efforts to combat fake products on its platform. The company added that they continuously invest heavily in battling against bad actors and are committed to turning counterfeits to zero on their platform. Moreover, courts have ruled in their favor in the first two instances of this action, and they are now expecting preliminary legal clarification from the CJEU.
Nonetheless, Coty did not immediately respond to the request, but the Luxembourg-based court, which looks in the majority of cases related to such non-binding recommendations, would normally provide a verdict in the next two to four months. For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:



Contact - US

Thursday, 19 December 2019

Letter Of Consent: A Remedy For Rejection Of Trademark Application In China


registered trademarks in china

Considering the benefits that a registered trademark can provide, more and more people and companies are continuously getting involved in activities like filing trademark applications. Once get approved, the trademark applications can ensure a lot of gains to not just the applicants (creators of product in most of the cases) but the consumers as well. All these, further, benefit the entire nation by positively impacting its economic growth, financial gainings, etc. Well, obtaining these advantages isn’t as easy as said. In general, the journey to achieve Registered Trademarks in China or other nations incorporates several hurdles. One of the most common obstacles that often affect the Trademark Registration in China is that the filed applications get rejected by the executives at the China Trademark Office (CTMO). The prime cause behind the rejection of trademark applications is the similarity between an applied trademark and any already registered or pending to get registered trademark holding earlier priority. When refusal takes place, it is usual for the trademark applicants to follow different paths and approaches to protect their interests.
Common Remedies for Refusal of Trademark Applications in China
  • Filing appeal to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) to display the significant differences signifying that the applied and the cited trademarks would not lead to public confusion.
  • Filing opposition, if still doable, then non-use cancellation application or invalidation application against the cited trademark.
Apart from the above-given remedies, a letter of consent is another alternative that can help you to overcome the refusal of your trademark application in China. Submitting this letter if the examiner issues an unfavorable decision based on a trademark with earlier priority is a beneficial way to prevent the refusal and worries related to it.

Letter of Consent
It is a written document in the form of a contract amid the owner of an already registered trademark, and the applicant applied for the registration of a new mark. It is a means by which the owner of the prior trademark grants consent for the registration and use of the same or similar trademark filed by the applicant. Although the approach associated with this letter isn’t stipulated in the Trademark Law of China, still TRAB has been maintaining this method by admitting and considering the letter while reviewing the application after refusal.

As per the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, the letter should meet the following requirements:
  • Both the trademarks – applied and cited – should be distinguishable even though the differences amid the two are slim
  • The trademarks must not be contrary or detrimental to consumer interests or public policies.
  • The conflicting parts that often consist of English characters or words involved in the applied and cited trademarks should not be identical. TRAB undoubtedly supports the co-existence of marks with identical English characters or words but in rare cases.
  • If both the trademarks are to be used in the Chinese market, they must not cause any confusion about the source of the products related to the mark.
  • In case the letter of consent is signed out of the mainland of China, it has to be notarized and appropriately legalized, else TRAB will reject it.
If signed successfully, the letter of consent can for sure be helpful to convince the examiner that both the prior registrant and the applicant believe that the new trademark would not lead to consumer or public confusion if it gets registered. Hence, the chances of success of the review will increase manifold. As the CTMO can assume that both the parties are in the best position/ situation to determine and decide whether consumer confusion would occur or not, this letter enjoys great deference in the whole procedure.
After going through the above-given statistics, it will not at all be wrong to conclude that submitting the letter of consent signed by the owner of the cited trademark can be one of the best ways to get the refused trademark applications successfully approved for the registration. Ultimately, it is worth remembering that this letter is a profitable approach widely accepted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and several other intellectual property offices worldwide. Another considerable point about this letter is that its use has increased by many times in recent years. Note that even the international intellectual property offices often accept this document based on the consideration that the two parties involved as subjects in the matter are in the best position to ascertain that no risk of confusion or misleading for the consumers is foreseeable. For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:






Contact - US

Wednesday, 11 December 2019

Justin Bieber Attempts To Trademark The Term – R&Bieber


trademark registration online

Justin Bieber, a Canadian pop singer-songwriter, is currently attempting to trademark the term “R&Bieber.”

TMZ, a tabloid news website, reports that Justin has been going back-and-forth in regards to dropping a new album – R&B soon – and it looks like he is stepping ahead to do so.  As per the reports, Justin and his team have filed official papers to trademark the phrase for “entertainment services in nature of live musical performances and production of sound recordings.” They also noted that the singer wants to trademark the same term for movies and merchandise, he is seeking to sell.
Bieber’s team filed for the Trademark Registration on October 31, which was just a few days after October 27, when he shared a photo of the phrase to Instagram. Hence said, as Bieber began teasing that he would be open to coming up with new music related to the specific term last month via Instagram, this news shouldn’t appear like a shaking surprise.
However, it is not clear to say whether “R&Bieber” will represent an album or not, but the fans must consider the Instagram post by the pop singer in which he wrote that if this post succeeds in getting 20 million likes, he will launch an album before Christmas.
On Instagram, Bieber posted, “Share it, like it, post it in your story, I gotta view the demand, love you guys – pumped for it! I am almost done, but your support would make me move faster.” Apart from this post, the pop singer made a statement that fueled fans’ excitement following his previous statement regarding – a kiss ass album ASAP. Justin robustly hints that he is planning to launch a new album and the Trademark Application signs that the album will be named “R&Bieber.”
Justin Bieber had released his last studio album – Purpose – around four years ago, so it is about phase for a new album from the famous and lovable Canadian artist. Though it’s after a long time, yet it doesn’t mean that the pop singer has been silent. He shed a combined record with Dan + Shay called – 10,000 hours – in October.
According to reports, Justin is expected to release his new album before the end of this year. Ultimately, whatever may be the implications of R&Bieber, Beliebers better get ready! For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com
Don’t forget to follow us on social media:





Contact - US

Tuesday, 10 December 2019

How To Develop A Trademark Strategy For Your Business?


trademark registration online

Are you planning to develop your business? It is significant to have a unique and distinct brand that’s recognizable by consumers as a sign of quality, trust, and satisfaction. These types of brands that attract business profits on one side are vulnerable to be infringed by others like competitors on the other side. Hence, a good trademark strategy is vital to create a brand that is easy to sell, satisfies the consumers, and maintains a distance from issues like Trademark Infringement. Trademark strategy can also help in ensuring that a unique name or logo representing your business will remain a symbol of your goodwill and reputation, instead of becoming descriptive of specific products originating from anyone.

Steps to Develop a Fruitful Trademark Strategy
1.     Execute Trademark Search
In the brainstorming stages of building your brand, a trademark search is helpful to determine whether or not any confusingly similar or identical trademark that can prevent Trademark Registration in regards to your product already exists. A trademark search, though, seems a little bit costly for firms having limited financial resources, yet it can help you in saving a lot of your hard-earned money that may likely get wasted on rebranding products and services once they were launched or promoted. It can also prevent issues like trademark infringement, and therefore, wastage of financial resources on settling them.
One can conduct a preliminary trademark search on his/her own. However, this type of search only captures trademarks identical to your mark in most cases. Besides, it fails to determine trademarks that have different spellings but the same sound, for example – Life and Lyfe. Accordingly, it is recommended to seek the help of an experienced Intellectual Property (IP) Attorney or trademark solicitor while conducting a trademark search.
2.     Be Careful About the Trademark Registration Process
After being familiar with the fact that trademarks can add a remarkable value to your brand, you may get tempted towards obtaining Trademark Protection in India or other nations for every symbol, name, etc., representing your business. Before proceeding, note that as the trademark registration procedure is country-specific, obtaining and enforcing several trademarks can be expensive as well as difficult. As a consequence, registering every single item in the vast suite of your business products doesn’t make commercial sense. Hence, Trademark Registration in India or any nation should always be carried out after prioritizing trademarks based on the value they provide and having complete information regarding how the process is carried out in the relevant nation.
3.     Market Your Trademark
The subsequent step in the trademark strategy procedure is to publicize your Registered Trademark to consumers so that they associate it with the satisfaction and quality related to your products and services. Do you rely on websites and social media platforms to advertise your products? Securing domain names and social media accounts will help in preventing competitors from making profits by using the same or similar names or accounts.
4.     Ensure Proper Usage
One pitfall trademark holder can fall into is condoning inappropriate trademark use by consumers and influencers in the area, spreading the usage in vernacular. One of the best examples of this is “Google®,” which was initially trademarked as a search engine but soon became a common verb to showcase searching for anything online. Although this isn’t always problematic for large brands; however, for small ones, it can lead to disastrous outcomes.
How can you prevent devaluing your trademark in this way? Ensure using your trademark protection for generic products or services that you are selling or planning to sell. Consider developing your marketing strategy based on the comparisons like – Kleenex® is the softest versus Kleenex® facial tissues are the softest. Avoid using your trademark in plural form instead of singular if it has been registered as a singular term.
5.     Fight Against Competitors
The aim behind developing a powerful trademark strategy is to make sure that your brand is the only one that makes profits on the goodwill and reputation you have created. To prohibit trademark infringement, you need to notify others regarding your trademark rights in as many as possible instances. For instance, if your trademark is registered, then you should showcase your trademarked term with ®. On the other hand, if it not registered, still you should mark it with TM symbol often put in superscript to notify others that you’re using the relevant symbol, word, or other as a trademark.

Wrapping Up
The precise trademark strategy can create goodwill and reputation that will uplift your brand from better to the best. Don’t forget that careful consideration and execution of an appropriate trademark strategy is not just beneficial but also essential to shaping consumer perception of your business’ products and services.

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:








Contact - US

Thursday, 5 December 2019

Backcountry Faces Customer Scrutiny Over Trademark Lawsuits


patent application process

Backcountry, the enormous online outdoor retailer supporting backcountry.com that has known as Utah home for the last 23 years, is suffering from a flood of criticism as word spreads about the online website moved to sue dozens of smaller outdoor brands and sellers for using the word “Backcountry” in their name or product description.
Backcountry, which first got the word trademarked in 2004, has filed some additional Trademark Applications emphasizing the usage of the term in the intervening years. And then, it has launched a legal invasion against around 50 different defendants listed in a publicly available document from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

So far the companies being sued over Trademark Infringement have ranged from an independent ski manufacturer – Snapperhead Inventions/Marquette Backcountry – for their Marquette Backcountry Ski, which is being sold under the term since 2010 to Backcountry Babes, an avalanche safety course instructor and jean manufacturer Backcountry Denim Co., known as BDCo. Although some companies like Backcountry Babes have already settled the matter with Backcountry.com, others such as Marquette Backcountry are gearing up for legal battle.
The lawsuit details that Backcountry requests exemplary and punitive damages in the form of amount enough to punish and deter defendants, along with setting an example for them as well as others. Now, after engaging in such a legal dispute, Backcountry is unlikely to end the chaos with a sympathetic public image. Complicating things is the fact “Backcountry” has been in common usage for nearly a decade before the firm’s founding, and many people feel it is unfair for a company to try or secure exclusive rights to the common word. As a result, the #boycottbackcountry has been spreading rapidly throughout the internet, especially social media, with almost every individual from potential consumers to professional athletes speaking against Backcountry.

A Utah-based trademark and Patent Attorney asked people to remain anonymous to evade any professional backlash. The attorney said that considering a few initial research and without being familiar with all the facts of the lawsuit, it looks like the company is trying to strengthen its trademark by not letting others use it. If firms don’t enforce their mark, there’s always a chance that it could later turn enforceable. Everybody should think of a trademark as a weapon instead of a shield. It further added that some specific rules should be made for generic terms, and these must not be secured under trademarks. Backcountry’s Trademark Registration in the year 2004 states that it was for mail-order services, computerized retail services, retail store services, but since then, it has expanded a lot.

John H.Kim was the individual who applied for the trademark on behalf of Backcountry in 2018. Backcountry hasn’t responded to several requests revolving around the issue. As considered now, the firm is forging ahead with multiple branded items that could have remarkable implications for other members going forward in the industry. Note that Backcountry has yet to comment publicly on the dispute. For more visit: https://www.trademarkmaldives.com

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:







Contact - US

Tuesday, 3 December 2019

Apple Possibly Have Taken Control Of ‘AirTag’ Trademark

intellectual property law

Rumors of an Apple-branded tile-like tracking device have been circulating for months, and now it appears that the device could be named as AirTag. References to AirTag found within the iOS 13.2 update hints that this tile-like device may appear very soon. Apart from a lot of rumors about this device, a trademark for ‘AirTag’ has also been found. According to several reports, a Russian firm filed a Trademark Application for ‘AirTag’ in October 2018.
Filed with USPTO (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office), the application appears very similar to what people have been expecting Apple to reveal for some time. It includes systems of radio frequency identification (RFID) comprised of RFID tags in the form of cards, key rings, tags. It also encompasses RFID markers in the form of RFID signal receivers, downloadable software for operating RFID readers, blank smart cards with ICs (integrated circuits), etc. All these systems and things are intended to be designed for enabling users to identify them automatically for obtaining keyless access control over interlocking doors and various services like public transportation, social events, banking, and more.
After a few back-and-forths, the application was approved in August 2019. Following that, the links to Apple begun to appear on 28th August. On 28th August 2019, when an official notice stating that the same application would be published on 17th September 2019 has been provided, the attorney representing the trademark application changed to the Moscow office of Baker & McKenzie, a firm with which Apple has worked on several occasions and in different countries.
Indeed, that wasn’t the application’s final resting place. Instead, around one month later, i.e., on 1st October 2019, it moved again and has been officially transferred to a company named as GPS Avion LLC. It is a firm that was just created in July 2019 and appeared to have no public presence. GPS Avion LLC was created in Delaware by the Corporation Trust Company, which is a process Apple has deployed quite a few times to build shell companies to hide its identity while dealing with Intellectual Property (IP) issues.
Nevertheless, none of the facts finally confirms that Apple holds the trademark for AirTag, but they altogether do show that someone does. Besides, the use of AirTag by Apple in iOS 13.2 generates high possibilities that the company is related to Apple in one or the other way.
Undoubtedly, the recent media event that had held in October hadn’t mentioned anything about AirTags or Tile-like features, but considering iOS 13.2 references the new tracking accessory, we expect that AirTags would be announced soon, possibly even this week. ✅    For view source: https://bit.ly/2LhV6gt

Don’t forget to follow us on social media:








Contact - US